buttons home

poems

short stories

rules

judges

results

success stories

photo galleries

history

help/FAQ

contact us

links

home

Log In


enter online      print entry form     buy anthology           

Bridport Prize 2001

   Short Story Judge - Kate Atkinson

One thing I feel fairly certain about - all judging is arbitrary and personal. A different judge would undoubtedly have chosen a different winning story. In a trawl of entries which displayed a gratifyingly high standard, there was not in the end not much to choose between the top five stories (which is a great shame for those writers I ranked in my 'fourth and fifth places). I imagine that someone with a dissimilar taste to mine could quite possibly have reversed the order or even chosen an entirely different story as the winner. So it goes.

There is a great deal written (much of it by story writers themselves) about the art and the form of the short story. Whereas most people feel no great need to define what a novel is, the story seems to exercise a peculiar fascination - both what is and what it is not - as if the story should fulfil a more particular purpose than the novel. We may debate the 'future' of the novel, the state of novel-writing, 'chick-lit', Brit-lit and heaven knows what else, but we all seem to know what a novel is.

One thing that everyone seems to agree on, however, is that the story should not be viewed as a literary apprentice-work and that to regard it as such is to devalue its literary merits - stories command little enough respect from publishers and booksellers as it is (they 'don't sell' we are forever being told)without them being regarded as amateurish, in practice form. But how else do we practise? How else does the would-be writer learn (apart from trying to read everything that has ever been written since time began, of course) if not by writing in a short form?Imagine how many more turgid novels (and there are enough already, surely?) would be wafting around the ether if it was the first text that everyone turned their hand to.

With the story we can experiment with form and structure and language, we can learn craft and technique, we can purge all that autobiographical baggage which - no matter how interesting to ourselves - is of no interest to anyone else (and trust me, it really isn't). And we can do the most important thing of all, which is to find our voice. Anyone can write, simply by virtue of the fact that anyone can wield a pen and do joined up writing - this I'm sure is why more people are would-be writers than would-be sculptors and would-be musicians. Not enough people who want to be writers understand that a text is as much an extract - a work of constructed art - as is a Van Gogh's Sunflowers or Mozart's Requiem.

Writing stories is an activity which fits into life as we live it, a life which may include job and children and precious little time. A story is so short that it can be laid out on a floor or a table and viewed in its entirety, a story is manageable. And to say that it is not to devalue the story as form nor to denigrate the best story writers. It is the story that some of the most interesting and innovative literary work is to be found - think of James' huge canon of stories (and there was a man obsessed with the form!) or of Hemingway's In our time one of the great seminal literary works of this century. think of Chekov or Katherine Mansfield or the under-rated stories of F Scott Fitzgerald, or nearer to our own time the work of Borges, Robert Coover, Donald Barthelme, or our contemporaries Ali Smith, Michel Faber, Helen Simpson.

I have studied and written stories for the last twenty-five years but I would hesitate to define what makes 'a good story'. Certainly we want form and structure of some kind, we want to hear a confident individual voice, but what is that gives us that sense of satisfaction on reading something good? That elusive something that sends us away knowing our lives have been improved in some small, indefinable way. I don't know. What I do know is that, like all novels, I believe that every good story is a journey, a journey at the end of which both the reader and the writer gain the satisfaction of having been taken somewhere. Somewhere else.

And so to the judging. In the end my choice came down to good writing, to a text well done, a tale well told. Stories which were clever for the sake of being clever didn't cut much ice with me, nor did angst-ridden introversion or stories about couples breaking up. What I was looking for was that after two or three readings a story would still seem fresh to me and that the memory of it would linger on, long after I had finished reading.

There were some stories which were almost there but not quite - Baby, for example, a nightmarish story about a baby that never stops growing, orThirty Dollars a moving story centred on unearthing an ancient child's body during the course of an archaeological dig. My ten runners-up displayed, I hope a fairly representative cross-section of work, all of them, I think, were individual voices - some very memorable indeed - the mentally-handicapped boy of The White Cadillac, the abused and misused Japanese wife in Designa Garu the funny, charming Wish List and the haunting Girl from Gobabis.

Blood and Diamonds was high on my list - a powerful, complex story set in Sierra Leone. Why didn't that make the top three when 'quieter', perhaps less ambitious stories did? I felt there was a novel in that story struggling to get out and there was something about the structure that made the story more intangible than was perhaps good for it. Breathing the Waves a lovely story that wasn't quite coherent enough. And Parting Shot a beautifully crafted rural story that encompasses an entire miserable day from dawn to nightfall and The Pass, a fearful story about fear in Northern Ireland - all of these four writers I believe have the talent to become published writers.

And so to the top three. I have to say that right up to the end I found it hard to settle on the ranking order of these but in the end I had to make decisions. In third place Ride - a story I loved for its freshness and energy, the tale of a dynamic coach ride from London to Scotland that ends in optimism and the real beginning of a life. Second - and hard to ignore -A Swan named Love, an extraordinary 'avio-erotic' tale of a Leda and her Zeus - perhaps of all the stories the one that remains most vivid in my mind.

I almost surprised myself with the winner, not really 'my kind of story' at all and yet the one I kept coming back to. The Runner is a quiet, understated story of a middle-aged man. Like Ride it too is a journey that is both real and metaphorical, unlike Ride the end is sad rather than hopeful, yet this story is also funny, and tender, and ironic and crafted - bursting with great images and wonderful turns-of-phrase. At the end of the day it's a simple thing, it's a well-written story. Who can ask for anything more?


Arts Centre
The Bridport Prize is a fundraiser for Bridport Arts Centre, charity no 1069780